Alright Noogie, here you go.
http://www.bible-researcher.com/hell1.html
This is an article that outlines how the idea of a perpetual, burning hell was a thoroughly Jewish idea, in fact we got it from them. The idea of this eternal hell was quite accepted and understood by the time Jesus came on the scene. If it was a myth or not a Jewish concept, you have to wonder why NOBODY ever challenged his teaching on hell. Why didn’t the Pharisees just say, “nuh uh, stupid! We as Jew’s don’t even have a concept of hell like what you mention, so there!”? When they thought He was wrong or blasphemous, they “took up stones to stone Him” or would attempt to trap Him in questions. But this doctrine of hell went totally unchallenged by everyone. They challenged Him on Sabbath issues, washing hands before eating, his reasons for eating with sinners and other things related to oral Law and its nomenclature.
So Noog, why didn’t people start questioning Jesus’ doctrine of hell until several hundred years after He was gone?
No, the church fathers didn’t create it. They put it in cement. It was well established, as well as His Diety. In fact, creeds only came into existance because of heresy against established, apostolic teachings. So creeds didn’t create any truth of any kind, they were only done for the sake of making what they believed easier to understand in light of goofy and heretical teachings (like yours mr. Noog) that were messing with people’s heads.
The development of this idea about hell is a trip. If you get a chance, scope out that article. It’ll take about 20 min. or so to read….well, I read kinda fast, so I don’t know. But anyway, this Bible Researcher web site has great articles on hell.
I noticed that in Matthew 25:46, after the sheep and goats are separated the sheep go into “eternal” life and the goats into “everlasting punishment”. Eternal and everlasting are the exact same Greek words. Over and over in the N.T. we find the same words that describe the eternality of heaven describing the eternality of hell (the smoke refered to in Revelation rises “forever”).
Noog’s idea of hell is cracked and whoever fed him this false history sketch of the development of the doctrine of hell is a loon with no grip on reality, much less do they even avail themselves to historical writtings on the subject.
I just have to wonder out loud to myself, “if hell is a myth, why the heck did Jesus talk about it at all? If it was a developing heresy, why not squash it like He did the oral Law? Why be so confusing by appearing to talk about something as if it’s real when it isn’t?” And yes, Gehenna was a type of hell, a perpetually burning, non-ending torment full of criminals, beasts and unclean things. No, it did not stand for a temporary “ouchie”. Again, study the history of this thing….that link at the top is a good start. Actually that whole website has good articles on it.
There’s no logic to your thinking Noogie. (if you must, you can say “marky” in retaliation…this is all in good fun, hope your not offended by my taking liberties with your screen name).
Why do we as humans feel this need to think of all kinds of stuff to believe to make Him nicer? What, does it make it easier to get saved or something? Grampa Jesus.
Knowing how much God hates sin and what hell is like was the backdrop of the revealing of God’s love and is what saved me. I deserve “that” and I’m getting “this“? “That” being an eternal hell and “this” being His life and love. I mean, dude, I’m as saved as saved can get (saved from what?). I’m a partaker of Life eternal…oops, wait…eternal doesn’t mean eternal I guess….well, only for heaven, just not hell….right?
You see how convoluted that thinking is? It’s a selfish “piece meal” approach to Jesus and the bible. Take it all or you can’t have any of it; God’s Truth is indivisible.
I still can’t figure out how Noog thinks hell is a myth. In fact, the doctrine of hell was taught in the gospels (Matthew, Mark and Luke) by Jesus. For crying out loud…There aren’t any other N.T. books that even talk about hell except Revelation. Paul didn’t talk about it…I think Peter mentioned it once, but he used a peculiar Greek word for it (Tartaraus, i.e. the abode of the evil dead). And Jude refered to it as a black darkness. In fact, Jude drew heavily from what is known as the book of Enoch, a non canonical book (for good reason). But in it is a very well drawn out teaching about hell, which is why Jews had no problem with Jesus speaking of it. But the fact remains that He spoke about this place more than anyone. He even related a true story about hell’s conscious torment when he talked about the rich man and Lazurus. No, not a parable. Every parable started off with something to the affect of “it is likened to”, or something similar. This story is introduced by Jesus in language that let’s us know it was an actual occurance, i.e. “there was a certain rich man…” (Luke 16:19). No metaphor, no simile. There ‘was’. Was is in the imperfect-indicative which means it was an absolute fact that this thing happened. Jesus brought us an actual story to sort of bring us face to face with a real-life scenario of what the damned experience in hell and what sort of things are longed for by those in the torment side of what was called ‘Hades‘ in this verse. Hades was known to be the grave, the realm of departed spirits and Jesus shows us that one side is a place of comfort (Abraham’s bosom) and one side is torment (“I am in agony in these flames”).
Again, look at the words “I am” in this passage. In the KJV it says “I am tormented”, but in the Greek it’s one word, odunao. This word is in the present-passive-indicative tense, meaning an ongoing, perpetual and absolutely real sense that is definitely being experiened by this one person speaking. Again, the language is not vague or ambiguous. Only those who desire to find alternate ideas can find them, but you have to subvert truth to do it.
So this idea of hell in Jesus’ time wasn’t foreign or new. In fact, all of the figures of speech that Jesus uses to describe hell come from Talmudic literature and current Jewish belief about hell. I know, I know; that really sorta pee’s on your “catholics created hell” campfire, but it’s true. I mean, you need only realize what I mentioned earlier, viz, nobody challenged Jesus’ teaching on hell, and that should help get your brain in gear to simply ask questions, as you asked us to do. Are you doing it now?
You know, it’s about the only teaching of His that did not get challenged. Isn’t that odd considering that it’s a myth (yet He talked about it as though real) and if it’s real it’s not forever, conscious torment (even though He used the same word for hell as for heaven, e.g. “ainios“)?
I mean, if it isn’t real then Jesus is a liar AND a lunatic, so is Peter and so is John…
SO WHAT THE HECK ARE WE FOLLOWING A WACKO FOR??!! Why do we follow Jesus at all if He spent so much time talking about a mythological place that doesn’t exist? Explaining it away by saying, “those were metaphors” won’t work. What were the metaphors pointing to? Metaphors always point to something real by using figurative language to help you understand the reality of what’s being communicated. A metaphor to describe nothing? Absurdity of the highest order.
And if it doesn’t burn forever then why did He confuse us (playing tricks, ay Jesus?) by using the same word that describes our yet future bliss and reward? He’s an absurd idiot and we need to reject Him outright if this is the case. Same with Peter and John. Deluded men they must be, if mister Noogatiger is right.
If hell isn’t real, why restrain our flesh? Let’s eat, drink and be merry for tomorrow we die and then just disappear or burn up and eventually quit being punished for our rebellion? Let’s pig out, drink up, and smoke out!
Do you even read your bible dude? Seriously, I am struggling to see how you can just skip over so many references that Jesus made about hell and it’s perpetuity. Do you have Thomas Jefferson’s bible?
Oy vey…
Well, that’s enough for now, at least to get a big ball rolling.
mark jr.
66 responses so far ↓
iseeitdifferently // January 5, 2008 at 8:28 pm
http://www.the-highway.com/annihilationism_Packer.html
J.I. Packer wrote this. I put the link here so I don’t forget to read it…lol…
mark jr.
Judah // January 6, 2008 at 12:18 am
I agree that there is a hell; even if one explains away Messiah’s teachings, we have prophecies in both old and new testaments regarding the place of judgment of the folks that did evil on this earth. Revelation calls this the “lake of fire”. Even the most hard-line unitarian will have a hard to getting around that term.
Shalom,
-Judah
Rob // January 9, 2008 at 7:37 pm
Jesus discussion of the rich man and Lazarus hardly seems allegorical to me. If hell is only death, then why is the rich man talking…suffering…begging for relief.
The gospel is exceedingly good news precisely because the consequences of our sin is such profoundly bad news. On the broader issue of judgment, these folks only want to focus on the love of God. 2 Peter 3 reminds us that in the last days false teachers will willfully forget that God destroyed the entire world, and all the people in it (except for eight) over sin.
By the way, we don’t often say it in these words, but Jesus, the creator was also Jesus the judge of his creation in the flood. And we aren’t talking about a few deaths here. In the pre-flood conditions, the world could have easily had 1 billion people on it.
No hell is just another way of saying no judgment. This would be a critical mistake for someone to make.
iseeitdifferently // January 9, 2008 at 10:20 pm
Wow, way to go with that 2Peter reference. That is exactly what these folks are doing…absolutely amazing.
mark jr.
noogatiger // January 10, 2008 at 2:14 am
Why didn’t lazarus tell us all about heaven when he came back to life?
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
When the church was recognized by Constantine and given ownership of the temples of the empire, she also inherited the members who worshiped their gods in those temples. In an effort to assimilate these people, many of their pagan beliefs were accommodated by the newly recognized state Church.
One corruption of Christianity that occurred at this time involved the importation of pagan beliefs concerning the underworld.
For the first 300 years, the Ante-Nicene Fathers and most Christians were Universalistic. They believed God loved all men and would ultimately, in this life or the next, reconcile all people to Himself through Christ. There was no talk of eternal conscious torment, because (surprise!) the Greek Fathers understood Greek. They did not labor under the presumption that words indicating periods of time somehow conveyed the thought of “eternity.”
The newly official church set about formalizing its government. One thing all government organizations understand is the use of fear as a tool for controlling men. The church adopted its new members’ pagan understandings of a hellish afterlife as a convenient means of frightening adherents into allegiance and submission.
It is entirely possible the English word “Hell” comes from “Hel,” the name of the Queen who presided over the Norse underworld. Certainly the word “Hell” does not appear in original manuscripts: Both the word and the concept are extra-biblical.
And so the Good News that God will rescue us all from our sins became the Bad News that He will actually put most of us in a pagan-inspired hellish underworld forever.
To this day the Church attempts to convince us an eternal Hell for the majority of mankind is somehow pretty good news.
It is a pagan myth boys and girls.
noogatiger // January 10, 2008 at 2:18 am
Oh and P.S
Jesus did not ever, never ever speak about hell. The authors contention above is bogus. During Jesus time there was no such word as Hell. Got that; there was no such word which meant eternal flames of eternal torment. Hades did not mean that. Sheol did not mean that, and even Gehenna with its fires did not mean eternal flames of eternal torment, it meant destruction. Now that is pretty simple boys and girls and this conludes your lesson for today.
There is no Hell.
Sinners and unbelievers go to eternal death.
Believers go to eternal life.
You don’t have to reconcile a God of love with an eternal God of hate and vengence. It ain’t so.
With love in my heart.
noogatiger // January 10, 2008 at 2:21 am
Oh, and you go a little far here don’t you think:
“”I mean, if it isn’t real then Jesus is a liar AND a lunatic, so is Peter and so is John…”"
Especially since they didn’t speak about Hell until the words were changed in English Bibles.
Rob // January 10, 2008 at 3:55 am
Nooga,
OK, you win. The rich man went to eternal death…but it was an eternal death in which apparently Jesus thought he still had rational processes and sensory suffering.
The length of your posts don’t make your arguments any more compelling.
Samuel // January 10, 2008 at 7:11 am
This is some interesting dialect here. But i would like to bring in another subject if i may…….
I think prison is tottaly rediculous. I mean i dont even know why we have it. All it is for is to send people who have done wrong to a place were they are locked up, and are tortured in theri minds, and pay for the wrong they did. Their is fighting and its just crazy. If i were in charge i would tottaly eliminate prisons, i mean why can’t we just have more grace, just tottaly forgive with no payment for what people do.
Does anybody see the rediculouseness of what i just said……
If we took out prisons we would have people who are tottaly guilty running around our streets, going without punishment for the wrong they did, IT WOULD BE TOTTALY UNJUST.
Let me say something, it is very clear throught scripture that God is the most just person thier is. Their is no court system, no church, no nation who who is trully as just as he is. That is very clear throught scripture.
Pro. 29:27An unjust man is an abomination to the righteous,
but one whose way is straight is an abomination to the wicked.
Our ways are wicked apart from God, and that makes us an abomination to him. You will definity not be in heaven if Jesus hasnt washed you with His blood. No man is righteous no not one. If we are not regenrated by the LIFE of Jesus and tottaly changed from our fleshly, wicked selves, then we are not in a right standing with God. You will not dwell with God if you are an abomination to Him. So if your not in heaven were in the world would you be, ETERNALLY separated from God, Hell.
So noogie, i dont think you really need some big theological evidence on hell. Because as long as theri is no punishment, in your mind, for the wicked things you do, you will justify every bit of odvious biblical evidence. I think you want their to be no Hell so you dont have to live the way scripture requires you to live.
God can not let us go unpunished. Unless the life that Jesus gave covers us. I is tottaly and completely the Cross that saves us from hell Nothing else. You must stop trying to justify your wickedness noogie, Jesus is the only one who can do that, with his blood.
To me the fact that Jesus became a curse for me shows me how much he really does love me. Jesus was punished in my place, by his own father. Not only so we can have hell insurance, but so we can be with our Heavinly Father for eternity. I really do care about you noogie, and love you. I only took time to write this for you. You must not find excuses around your sin and just repent of it and let Jesus tottaly regenerate you.
Eddie // January 10, 2008 at 4:37 pm
“And so the Good News that God will rescue us all from our sins became the Bad News that He will actually put most of us in a pagan-inspired hellish underworld forever. ”
Noog,
“Enter by the narrow gate; for wide is the gate and broad is the way that leads to destruction, and there are many who go in by it. Because narrow is the gate and difficult is the way which leads to life, and there are few who find it.”
You words are more prophetic than you know.
Fallen people set aside the Law of God, constantly inventing new systems that accomidate their shortcomings, then affirming that they are ok before thier gods, based on their own personal criteria or religious beliefs and behaviors.
Hell will be full of people who thought highly of Jesus.
let me ask you one question. Do you consider yourself a good person?
Noogatiger // January 16, 2008 at 6:08 pm
It really doesn’t matter in this discussion if I consider myself to me good or bad. The fact of the matter is that there is no such place as hell. There was no word for eternal hell in the original language of the Bible. Even the origin of our English word Hell was Hel, which meant “to cover up, or place in a hole.”
The wages of sin is death. (Genesis). That is the punishment for sin. Death, forever dead. Eternal life was only promised to believers. (John 3:16).
Eternal torture is not a just and righteous punishment for a few years of unbelief here on earth, death is. How can God watch people being burned for eternity and not be forever sad about that? How could I even enjoy heaven if I could see or remember that I have loved ones burning forever in hell, unless God lobotomizes us all, will God also lobotomize himself so that he can’t remember all those people he sent to hell?
If your girlfriend said to you; if you don’t love me I hope you burn in hell, would you think she is sane?
Bottom line, Hades, Sheol and Gehenna were translated with a word which later took on a completly different meaning from the original language. It is time we fixed this.
iseeitdifferently // January 16, 2008 at 9:30 pm
Wow.
Uh, okay…
Your sentiments about God and hell reek of humanism. “POOF” punishment is a slap on the wrist. Heck, if that’s all I have to look forward to, let’s party now and pay later….no wait, we don’t pay at all! SWEET!!
I won’t be thinking about those in hell. God’s justice is eternal, His nature is eternal, His law is eternal, His holiness is eternal. Therefore, the only way He can deal with breaking the eternal law of an eternal God is with eternal death. I’m pretty stoked that He even made a way out for me and that will pretty much be the focus of my eternal praise and worship. At that point, I’ll be perfect, known as I’m fully known, seeing face to Face and I will have no problems with my current human hang ups regarding anything. You, Noog, are stuck in the valley of sappy, human sentimentality and are transposing what you want God to be upon what He actually is. This is idolatry. You have made for yourself a golden calf and called it ‘Elohim‘. You serve as a great example of those who can’t accept God as He is on His own terms as He has handed them down to us and therefore you begin to toy with His nature, His justice and His view on sin and punishment. Now you serve a god who doesn’t exist. It’s not wood, stone, gold or silver, it’s in your mind. Really, you’re bowing down to yourself. You want a god like you, as is evidenced by your pathetic reasoning which you would suppose could actually refute what the bible plainly teaches. He’s not a man. “You thought I was such a one as yourself” was God’s indictment against Israel. You have fallen into the same category and therefore are now making the same mistakes. Your crime against God is not small; you’ve perverted His Name and His essential characteristics.
So then where was Jesus while His body was dead? Yes, “into thy hands I commit my spirit”, but then what?
Seems to me, as my memory serves me, that He preached to the righteous dead on the Paradise side of Hades (1Peter 3:19, 4:6)…but I guess that couldn’t have happened in a non-place that doesn’t exist. Silly Jesus….He should have known better. It’s just odd how those 2 verses imply a literal place and actual preaching taking place and uh…hmm…I guess that was just a holy “Oopsie”…
…so hell doesn’t exist…or hades, sheol…whatever. Uh, then what do we do with 2Peter 2:4 which tells us plainly that hell is a place that now holds certain demons prisoner in chains? It doesn’t exist, but it’s a detention center at the same time? No gamesplaying with “original languages” is going to explain that one away. And you’re totally ignoring the fact that the concept that we currently have of hell isn’t developed by Catholics, but by Jews of the old Rabbinical type, before Jesus. Again, they gave us Gehenna….we just gave it an English name, but this in no way changes what it still IS. These places don’t have names (implying location) just to describe a “poof, you’re gone” kind of thought. You’re being silly….if I told you that hypocrites are sent to Walmart, you wouldn’t be able to convince anyone with a rational mind that I don’t think Walmart is real and that when you get there you just disappear. If this was the case, the bible would use language that clearly implies “disappearing”.
But you are doing a cute little jig here, dancing around the obvious truth and all…with your very heart felt, human sentimentality. You’re a great anthropologist but a horrible bible teacher.
Hell isn’t real but is said to be what sets the tongue on fire? If it doesn’t exist then how does James justify what he says in 3:6 about the tongue? I understand that “set on fire” is metaphoric of being induced with great zeal, but still, if hell never existed at all and is not even real…..then where the heck does this symbolic language come from? Do you mean to tell me that on the basis of nothing we get a description of something? This place isn’t real, yet people draw on it’s reality for description of something? You make no sense.
And you didn’t answer Rob or myself when we brought up the rich man suffering in an ongoing, continual state and being concious of and in his torment. If hell is just “poof”, why did Jesus lie to us and try to trick us into believing that hell might be somewhere we could actually dwell? Again, you make Him a liar.
I mean, for not existing at all it sure is strange how it’s described with adjectives and other kinds of descriptive language, like “gloom of utter darkness” (2Peter 2:17) and “weeping and gnashing of teeth” (this implies time, i.e. one moment passing into another which requires space, hence a real place). How can you have time to weep and gnash teeth in a place that isn’t real? Why bother to describe what can’t be? Nonsense, absurdity of the highest order.
Again, the torment of hell (second death, lake of fire, whatever) is described in Revelation as smoke that rises forever and ever….wierd….that’s funny how those words describe heaven’s REAL existance (forever and ever).
And don’t think of death as ceasing to exist. You and I were born, nursed from our mothers, ran and played, broke bones, rode skateboards and yet we were dead in sin and tresspasses. Death isn’t just non-existance, it’s a state of worthlessness, enmity against God and weakness when applied to our spirits. We are dead to sin, yet alive because of Christ. So death is not a non-state but a certain kind of state. Hell is the continual experience of death. Just ask the rich man….
Jude v.6 ESV “And the angels who did not stay within their own position of authority, but left their proper dwelling, he has kept in eternal chains under gloomy darkness until the judgment of the great day—”
Eternal? Dang, there’s that pesky word again. Almost sounds like this place never goes away, like heaven never goes away….you know, since ‘eternal’ is the same word used to describe heavens continuity.
Noog, there were words that imply a temporary state of something in the Koinae Greek and they would have been great to use in regard to hell if this is indeed what God was trying to teach us, but the Holy Spirit wasn’t trying to teach us this so He didn’t inspire those words to be used. He used words and phrases that describe locations and experience, something you are trying your hardest to overlook. He even went so far as to cause Peter to use a Greek word that the Greek speaking people of that day would instantly recognize which described the dark, gloomy underworld known as Tartarus, a place of chambers, evil lords and torment for the wicked. Again, if we aren’t supposed to come away with the idea that hell is a real place then why did Peter lie to us? Man, I gotta ask myself, if God didn’t want us to think that this place
1) was real,
2) depressing,
3) dark,
4) painful,
5) eternal,
then why did He painstakingly do what it took to convey these ideas with these kinds of exact words?
Tag, you’re it.
mark jr.
Noogatiger // January 18, 2008 at 6:27 pm
The story of Lazarus and the rich man is a parable. Not a real story.
Would the loving God of the Bible design an everlasting torture chamber? If so, He would have to witness—for the rest of eternity—the suffering of those that He had condemned to such a “hell.” That would make his a sadist not a God of love.
We might also ask: How enjoyable could salvation be for the saved, if they were forced to watch their children or parents—and other loved ones—screaming in pain and agony for the rest of time?
How could Jesus claim Victory over Hell, if many more than half of the earth’s population is going to hell? How could he look himself in the mirror after claiming victory? Many billions have lived and died without ever knowing the name of Jesus Christ and without ever having an opportunity for salvation, or being witnessed to at all.. Are we to believe that they are now roasting in a man-made “hell” devised by pagan poets? If the unsaved, upon death, go directly to hell, then well over half the people who have ever lived are there!
The Hebrew word translated hell in the Old Testament is sheol. It has a New Testament counterpart, hades. Actually, if you look up sheol in a concordance, it will reference the Greek word hades. They both mean “the grave, pit, world of the dead or hell.” Hell is the tomb. In saying this, we have just discovered that all people do, in fact, go to “hell” at death! Since the Bible does say, “it is appointed unto all men once to die” (Heb. 9:27), then everyone does die and goes to hell—literally, the grave.
Over thirty-five years ago people in England, in the 1600s, spoke commonly of planting or putting their potatoes in hell through the winter. They understood that hell was a dark, cold, quiet place that was a hole in the ground. This word held no mystery for them. Virtually all sources agree that sheol and hades are the same and that both refer to the grave.It was only with the passing of time that the pagan view of hell, as a blazing underground inferno, came to replace this original intent of the word.
A God of mercy and compassion could never torture anything or anyone—let alone do it for all eternity. Carefully consider these verses:
Psalm 104:35: “Let the sinners be consumed out of the earth, and let the wicked be no more.” Simply take this verse for exactly what it says, adding nothing to it. It is consistent with all that we have seen so far about the fate of the wicked. The next series of verses is stronger.
Psalm 37:9-12, 20, 22, 29: “For evildoers shall be cut off: but those that wait upon the Lord, they shall inherit the earth. For yet a little while, and the wicked shall not be: yes, you shall diligently consider his place, and it shall not be. But the meek shall inherit the earth; and shall delight themselves in the abundance of peace. The wicked plots against the just, and gnashes upon him with his teeth…But the wicked shall perish, and the enemies of the Lord shall be as the fat of lambs: they shall consume; into smoke shall they consume away…For such as be blessed of Him shall inherit the earth; and they that be cursed of Him shall be cut off…The righteous shall inherit the land, and dwell therein for ever.”
What is so hard to understand guys: There is no confusing this description of the fate of the wicked.). They will DIE, not live forever in a place which was dreamed up by a pagan philosopher.
Oh by the way eternal was a word translated in our bibles for something in the originals which meant someting more like: for an age. This did not mean forever and ever.
The Holy Spirit had nothing to do with teaching the doctrine of eternal hell. It came from Dante and pagan philosphers. That is the bottom line. Our original scriptures were corrupted.
Mary // January 18, 2008 at 11:16 pm
Noogatiger,
You are repeating the same stuff. Didn’t you already say that before ?Or have I read it on another blog. You must be everywhere.
cheryl // January 19, 2008 at 12:46 pm
Hi Mary! You probably DID read Noogatiger’s spiel on another blog. He seems to visit and comment on Christian blogs and message boards whenever the issue of eternal damnation comes up. Unless there is another “noogatiger” out there who believes in annihilation as the second death, and explains away hell as a concept that was NOT in the original scriptures, then he’s the same guy. I may be wrong, but I don’t think he’s even a Christian, or would describe himself as a Christian. Take a gander here….
http://christianblogs.christianet.com/cgi-bin/christianblogs.cgi?q=119852368914161&mode=viewmember&name=Noogatiger
Noogatiger’s Blog Replies
iseeitdifferently // January 19, 2008 at 5:28 pm
Thanks Cheryl…
I edited your link so that it would hyperlink.
Yeah, this guy obviously has no life outside of saying stupid stuff on as many blogs as he can.
He’s probably one of these guys that lives in his mom’s basement and plays “Magic: The Gathering” with his friends while they sit around listening to Radiohead, reading Brian MacLaren and Rob Bell books, drinking Guiness 4 packs and trying to find really intelligent sounding, humanistic reasons why these things can’t be true….
…yet refusing to engage the rest of the logical arguments while running around in circles (verbally) with his fingers in his ears yelling, “lah lah lah lah lah lah, God is love, lah lah lah”.
You can’t take guys like this seriously, especially when you see them repeating themselves with no intelligent answers and purposely ignoring 3/4’s of what was written. It’s like me arguing with a 3 year old who keeps saying, “nuh uh stupid head!”.
Shine on you crazy diamond!
mark jr.
cheryl // January 19, 2008 at 9:31 pm
Now wait a minute! I LIKE Radiohead! But really, this heresy is promoted by Christian Universalists, and they offer the same arguments as Noogie here. Methinks he may have visited a few CU message boards in order to hone his “Christian debating” skills. I’m going to pray for him. And I was just kidding about Radiohead.
iseeitdifferently // January 21, 2008 at 2:58 am
Noogatiger:
Okay, so now it’s not a matter of “the bible doesn’t teach eternal punishment”, but now it’s a matter of “the bible is corrupted”.
I like how you switch tracks when your schmaltzy, human sentimentality quits working against reason and logic.
The story of the rich man was a real story; it had no parabolic language. Go back and look at what I posted about it; it’s concrete.
Fact remains; Jews believed in an actual underworld of departed spirits and no one challenged Jesus when He talked about it. He described a man in concious agony, speaking, observing, looking and begging. Explain that one.
Again, you also ignore the fact that demons are held prisoner somewhere right now as we speak according to the bible; the lake of fire will burn forever and the “torment” of the beast, false prophet, satan and all who follow him will be “forever and ever”. Smoke only rises when there is a fuel for the fire. Smoke rising forever means just that: burning that never ends in an actual place. All who follow satan will go there with him. To follow satan, according to the satan scriptures, is simple: “do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the law”, i.e. anything that your flesh want to do or believe is the perfect lifestyle for the perfect fulfillment and embodyment of true, grassroots satanism. Not killing babies or goats, just do what you want.
So if you can’t quit embarrassing yourself with silly remarks, go to a fresh blog that doesn’t know you yet and attempt to sound smart somewhere else by copying and pasting in the comment boxes the thoughts of other men and pass them off as your own. Like I couldn’t tell…your writting style has bad spelling and sentence structure and immaturity, but your first response was obviously someone else because it was somewhat articulate and was structured properly. You didn’t fool anyone but yourself and that’s sad when you trick yourself. And the funny thing is that you probably thought, “ah yeah, that’ll get ‘em good!” and it was just silly rhetoric with nothing to substantiate it. Stating your case with zeal doesn’t make it true.
mark jr.
Noogatiger // January 24, 2008 at 7:21 pm
To correct one miss-statement.
The Bible we have today is corrupted, with the eternal hell doctrine, of pagan origin.
The original scriptures did not contain this hellacous doctrine, thus the original Bible did not teach it.
I am a former born-again, saved by grace, fundamentalist Baptist Christian, for 39 years. I am now agnostic. There may be a God, nobody knows. Christians hope theirs is the right one like anyone else. When I began reading the Bible and researching it to see if it could be truth instead of blindly accepting that it was truth, boy did I have my eyes opened. Big time.
Besides the Hell issue, I have found it to be full of errors, blatant contradictions, failed prophecies, scientific errors, cosmological errors, problems and inconsistencies in the very development of the canon itself and quite simply made up stories.
Yep, I go all over the internet, combating ignorance.
I live in Chattanooga Tennessee, son of a preacher man, married to the daughter of a preacher man, in a family full of fundamentalist Baptist. I have come out of the brainwashing and feel it my duty to help others out of it as well. Feel free to check out my MySpace link above. [ed. note: link erased because I don't promote feeding internet trolls (mark jr.).] Your definition of me above was funny, but not totally accurate, but funny.
One day, I asked myself a this simple honest question. What if my doubts are not really from the Devil? I mean I have doubts about a lot of things which I am presented with in life and this is a good thing most of the time, because it keeps me from ending up drinking the purple Kool-aid of some cult, or being conned into the latest scheme, winding up a Mormon, or sending money to Robert Tilton, Paula, Ernest Aingly, or Jimmy Swaggert. Whomever created me gave me this ability, so maybe, just maybe it isn’t the Devil making me doubt, maybe these problems with the Bible are real problems and I have just been believing these fairy tales, because I was scared not to.
I began to look at and consider things which I had simply never considered before. There was the starlight and star distance problem. How could the universe only be 6,000 to 10,000 years old, when we see light from stars and things like supernova explosions which take hundreds of thousands or even millions of years to reach us? I began to look consider the geologic column which simply does not match up with a single creation event as the Bible says, nor does it show that there was ever a worldwide flood event. The geologic column was discovered before the theory of evolution and clearly shows different layers of rock laid down over millions of years with different species of creature in each layer. This does not match the Genesis creation story at all. I began to look at the diversity of animal species spread across the globe and came to realize that there is no way that Koalas or Kangaroos could have gotten to Australia from Noah’s Ark.
Ladies and Gentlemen since that day I have discovered a new and better way to live. I am free from the fear of an eternal hell. (Scary ain’t it). I am free from the fairy tales of my past. I no longer struggle to make sense of new information, new science, evolution, or the light from the stars, or how the universe began, because now I don’t have to struggle to make it fit somehow into my old belief system, which explains none of it.
Funny thing is, now that I am free of this stuff, I am still a moral individual, just like I was before. I still love people, and my family just like I did before, maybe even more. Life is good, and in fact better than it was before. Life actually makes sense now, because I have come to realize that God was not responsible for anything which happened to me, good or bad. Once I realized this, then all the WHY questions went away. Every Christian struggles with those questions. If you believe that God is in control, then you can’t help but wonder WHY, when some terrible things come into your lives. It is simple human nature to want to know why somebody would do or allow those things to happen to you.
There is a better way to think, a better way to live, which actually makes sense of the world and the things which happen in it, and does not have to be constantly reconciled with what you have been taught is the truth. It is called the mind set free, and it doesn’t come from the devil, or from some narcissistic view of my own intellect. Think about that, if you aren’t afraid to.
Love you guys, hope you find the real truth.
P.S, do a check on Christianet Blogs for Mickey as well, I have some good ones on there.
iseeitdifferently // January 24, 2008 at 7:43 pm
So you pretend to be a bible defender. That’s a lie.
You pretend to care if pagan lies are in the bible. That’s a lie.
You say you want to be like Jesus. That’s a lie.
Then you come up with this last tid bit.
So really, you’re a liar with too much time on your hands. You came here under false pretense. You really only came here to try and “peddle your wares”. Why didn’t you just come right out with it? Why all the lies and bogus pretending? I have no respect for liars and fakes, and you deserve none. If you would have come in here with honest inquiry rather than this stupid game you’ve played, perhaps dialogue would have been found here. Aren’t you a little too old to play 15 year old head games with people? 39?
You see dude, this blog ain’t about nothing but certain specifics that relate to pentecostal/charismatic culture in the church. I write from and to that mindset. There are hundreds of blogs that deal with inerrancy, scientific evidences, fulfilled prophecy and more…you chose to pick a fight in a place that you can plainly see has no discussion of this kind. Go pick a fight on John MacArthurs blog, write to R.C. Sproul, challenge John Piper or Dr. Michael Brown to debates. Fancy yourself an intellectual giant? Go take on a giant. I mean, if what you got is what they need, go school the schooled. Prove your worth, prove your knowledge.
As for me, I can’t fake what happened to me to get me born again. When you burn your hand on a stove, no scientist can tell you that seeing the burn marks are pyscosomatic or imagined: it’s real, you see the difference and feel it.
I got burned 9 1/2 years ago (inside). I guess now I’ll have to post my testimony. The Lord has been prompting me to do this for some time….been dragging my feet. Your ramblings today prove to me that indeed it’s time I post my testimony. It’s almost like when I got done reading your stuff the Lord elbowed me and said, “See? I told you to write it. Tell My story!”.
So I guess I’ll have to….probably this weekend or perhaps on a day this week that I get off early….
…no, Saturday probably.
And if you’re mind is half as open as you think it is, go to my Answers in Genesis link and go get a couple Lee Strobel books. He found Jesus as an Athiest (an agnostic is an athiest who’s too chicken to say so). He was a journalist for The Chicago Tribune, or something like that…can’t remember the name, but he was also a lawyer and took the laws pertaining to evidence and applied it to the resurection and all of the bible and could not logically dispute it anymore. HE had an open mind….and yes, that is to imply that perhaps you do not. Take his challenge; read his books and follow how he came to where he is.
You’re not a seeker, you’re a “forget that crap”er.
You’re unfortunate to have grown up in your wierdo “King James Only” family. Sorry about that. Fundamentalist Baptist folks like you describe are the biggest killers of faith, not the so-called logic you think you’ve found. And you really didn’t do any homework; tell the truth, you just went to agnostic websites and swallowed deep because it suits you.
By the way, if you’re going to post, make sense, i.e. stay on topic. It’s blog decorum and not hard to do. As I said, go to the bloggers who love dealing with the specifics that you think you’ve cornered the market on.
And quit lying and pretending when you go to a new blog.
mark jr.
Noogatiger // January 24, 2008 at 7:49 pm
I do intend this year to live my life more like Jesus, to share a glass of wine with the sinners, to not be judgmental of them and to stay away from the self-righteous church crowd. We are birds of a feather.
Noogatiger // January 24, 2008 at 7:54 pm
By the way, I have read Lee Stroble, not much there really, now how bout you trying John Loftus books, . dare ya. Lot more meat there.
P.S I have never fancied myself as an intellectual giant of any kind, but I can spot BS pretty good. God or whomever created me gave me that ability.
If you do nothing else, at least be honest with yourself about hell. It was not even in YOUR own original scripture. It simply wasn’t DUDE.
iseeitdifferently // January 24, 2008 at 11:42 pm
Uh, genuis, hate to break it to you but you have not given so much as one iota of proof for that last statement.
Stating your case doesn’t prove it and neither does copying and pasting dumb crap from someone else’s website full of more rhetoric like yours.
It’s in every single last cotton pickin’ transcript of every language.
Now if you have some kind of doctorate in semitic languages, Greek, Latin, Syriac, Ethipian, Arabic and many other languages that copies of the New Testament is in, then I will simply dismiss you as knowing nothing that you speak of when you assert that the doctrine of hell is not in the originals.
Again, stating your case doesn’t prove it no matter how many times you say it and regardless of the emotion you invest in it.
mark jr.
Jim B. // January 27, 2008 at 11:05 pm
Ah, man… I was getting all geared up, and now I see the party’s over.
Haven’t I seen you at De-Conversion, Noog? That is pretty classless to pretend to be something you’re not.
DT // January 28, 2008 at 4:46 pm
Revelation 20:13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire
It’s called the second death. Unless one can prove by the Bible that ALL men have immortal souls, or that ALL men will have immortal souls, then one must conclude that those cast into the lake of fire will die. Not even God can torment a mortal soul without end, can He?
A death, where a soul really never dies, makes about as much sense as a soul with everlasting life that never really lives forever. This can’t be, in either case.
Can’t you see the difference between everlasting death, and everlasting life? One is mortal, the other is immortal. Mortal can die, immortal can’t. But both are still everlasting. Everlasting life..everlasting death. One is alive forever..the other one is dead forever.
What is required, that thru Christ, the mortal must put on immortality to obtain everlasting life, so to obtain never ending death, the mortal must put on immortality there also. How can anyone argue against that logic? But where does it state that those cast into the lake of fire puts on immortality? And finally once again, where does it state anywhere in the Bible, the soul that sinneth, it will die, but not really really die
noogatiger // January 28, 2008 at 6:36 pm
I would like to see you boys anser DT’s questions.
Just lurking?
Jim B. // January 29, 2008 at 2:49 am
DT,
Way to selectively quote the text to completely change its meaning.
Rev. 20:10-15
(Rev 20:10) …and the devil who had deceived them was thrown into the lake of fire and sulfur where the beast and the false prophet were, and they will
be tormented day and night forever and ever.
(Rev 20:11) Then I saw a great white throne and him who was seated on it. From his presence earth and sky fled away, and no place was found for them.
(Rev 20:12) And I saw the dead, great and small, standing before the throne, and books were opened. Then another book was opened, which is the book of life. And the dead were judged by what was written in the books, according to what they had done.
(Rev 20:13) And the sea gave up the dead who were in it, Death and Hades gave up the dead who were in them, and they were judged, each one of them, according to what they had done.
(Rev 20:14) Then Death and Hades were thrown into the lake of fire. This is the second death, the lake of fire.
(Rev 20:15) And if anyone’s name was not found written in the book of life, he was thrown into the lake of fire.
Are there two lakes of fire? How is it that the devil is tormented forever and ever in the same place that humans souls go to be annihilated?
Yes, it is the second death, and it is eternal, just like the “second life”.
I don’t even know if there’s any point in arguing with someone who purposefully truncates scripture in order to argue the opposite of what that scripture explicitly teaches.
“How can anyone argue against that logic?”
How, indeed.
DT // January 29, 2008 at 5:01 am
“DT,
Way to selectively quote the text to completely change its meaning.”
You can say what you want. Revelation 20:10 is specifically speaking of satan. No mention of human souls in that verse and that judgment?
Was man created immortal?
Instead of dancing around the issue, prove by the Bible that ALL men have immortality. The only way for any human to be tormented without end, that human would have to be immortal.
Until you can prove that, this endless torment is a false doctrine. But I’ll help you a little here.
Genesis 3:22 And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23 Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
24 So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
These verses right here prove that if man was immortal, he no longer was after the fall. One can’t live forever unless they are immortal, can they? Obviously as of verse 22, man was not immortal.
And if you can’t prove ALL men have immortal souls, then you can’t prove ALL humans cast in the lake of fire are tortured endlessly. If they are tortured endlessly, then this makes them immortal. there is NO way to get around that fact.
And if you want to make the claim that God can torture mortal souls forever without end, you have just contradicted yourself. The soul would no longer be mortal since it was unable to die
DT // January 29, 2008 at 5:28 am
I would like to leave these thoughts while I’m on a roll.
Do you think that all of your loved ones, and your friends will make it into the kingdom of God? Don’t you think that there is a good chance that some might be lost?
Since Christ will be the judge there, perhaps you can request to have honors at casting your loved ones into the lake of fire, where they will be tormented without end. Do you think you can do that?
And if the answer is no, why would you want to put something
so horrendeous into the hands of the Saviour to do?
If you being a mere human couldn’t do it, then why do you think Christ could do it?
They’ll get cast into the lake of fire alright, but not to be tortured without end, but to be utterly destroyed.
That’s what a merciful God would do. If something was no longer any use for Him, He would utterly destroy it, not endlessly torment it.
It’s no wonder so much of the world is turned off by what we call Christianity. Too many professed Christians claiming their God is a God that endlessly torments souls in a lake of fire
iseeitdifferently // January 29, 2008 at 5:29 pm
Again, you and your friend Noogatiger offer human, emotional arguments. Emotion is not logic. I’m fine with God’s justice. It’s a hard saying and it is the reason why I take every moment of life seriously. Eternity hangs in the balance for all I come across and it’s of uttmost importance that I be a living demonstration of God’s mercy that is extended.
Jesus told a parable about a wicked servant. This servant, in essence, told Jesus, “You’re a hard man and unfair so I didn’t feel like working for you. Here, here’s the life I lived that you gave me. I didn’t do anything with it for you, but here you go anyway.”
Jesus’ response was along these lines: “You wicked and lazy servant! You thought I was hard and unfair? Then that should have been a source of motivation to actually try to do something with your life. You thought I was a big mean jerk and you did nothing with your life? Your own words judge you. If I’m a bad guy then that’s all the more reason that you should gotten off your lazy butt and done something with your life. Now you’re going with the hypocrites where there will be (perpetually) weeping and gnashing of teeth.”
Yes, perpetually is the sense of the Greek word used to describe the “being” of the torment.
DT, all the answers to your (chuckle/snicker) “logic” are in my post and subsequent responses. I don’t have time to repeat myself over and over. Go waste someone else’s time.
Logic….(?)
mark jr.
Jim B. // January 29, 2008 at 10:35 pm
DT,
“Revelation 20:10 is specifically speaking of satan. No mention of human souls in that verse and that judgment?”
No, that ONE VERSE does not mention human souls – precisely why you should read it in the context of the whole thought, chapter and book.
DT // January 30, 2008 at 12:27 am
Jim B,
“Revelation 20:10 is specifically speaking of satan. No mention of human souls in that verse and that judgment?”
“No, that ONE VERSE does not mention human souls – precisely why you should read it in the context of the whole
thought, chapter and book.”
Verse 10 has nothing to do with the context of the verses following. If it did, then the statement about being tormented day and night would have been declared at the end of the chapter. Clearly the author was making a distinction between the fate of satan, and the fate of humankind.
And besides, verse 14 tells us this is the second death. What would this have to do with satan? Where did he ever die once? So how can this second death apply to him, since you claim all these verses must be interpreted together? You’re the one reading these verses out of context.
Also, I’m still waiting for proof via Scriptures that ALL mankind is immortal. Why can’t any of you prove that? Why don’t any of you address that issue? I know exactly why. Because you can’t.
You can’t prove your case without proving all mankind is immortal
iseeitdifferently // January 30, 2008 at 10:17 am
No, genius, I already did and I’m not going to keep repeating myself for your “special needs”.
DT // January 30, 2008 at 3:33 pm
isid,
I’ve got to ask, are you even a Christian? It’s kind of hard to tell, especially the way you treat others that disagree with you.
You don’t know me, I don’t know you, and I don’t know this noog. I just found this site while googling the other day.
You keep saying that you’ve already proved your case, and you’re not about to repeat yourself over and over. I believe that’s fair. So why not provide me with a link where you proved ALL mankind is immortal, and let me read it for myself.
You never know, one of us might learn something here. I don’t claim to know all of the answers. Do you?
Mary // January 30, 2008 at 5:48 pm
DT,
If you want to know the answer why not pick up a Bible or google hell.
Perhaps Mark is just getting tied of typing the same old crap to Noog who is not really interested in what anyone else has to say. He’s just looking for a fight. You sound like a big boy or girl. It’s not hard – just look in a bible concordance and look for all the references of hell. You know, things like” and they will be cast into the bottomless pit where the worm never dies”. You can do it. Yo don’t need Mark to hold your hand. It’s not rocket science.
DT // January 30, 2008 at 6:18 pm
“DT,
If you want to know the answer why not pick up a Bible or google hell.
Perhaps Mark is just getting tied of typing the same old crap to Noog who is not really interested in what anyone else
has to say. He’s just looking for a fight. You sound like a big boy or girl. It’s not hard – just look in a bible concordance
and look for all the references of hell. You know, things like� and they will be cast into the bottomless pit where the
worm never diesâ€?. You can do it. Yo don’t need Mark to hold your hand. It’s not rocket science.”
Mary, all I’m trying to do is discuss these things in a civilized manner. And it appears that I am under attack here.
I would be glad to discuss “why their worm never dies”, etc. I know exactly what this is referring to, and it’s not eternal torment.
To set the record straight. I don’t believe in universal salvation, and I don’t believe in endless torment. I also don’t believe in any pre-trib rapture. Mid or post…yes. But pre…no.
I believe that Jesus Christ is Lord, and I believe He’s coming back. I believe Christ to be God, just like it’s stated in Scriptures
Mary // January 30, 2008 at 6:38 pm
DT,
“I don’t believe in endless torment”
Well then why does it say endless torment? What does it mean that the worm never dies? Come on DT. Don’t create God in an image to your liking.
iseeitdifferently // January 30, 2008 at 10:23 pm
DT, I don’t need to put a link. I told you exactly where to find it. It’s in the post and in subsequent responses.
Yes, I’m quite weary of people who seem to almost purposely ignore what’s right in front of their face and my patience is threadbare. Read. Just read. I’ll give you a hint: it’s about a guy named Lazurus and a rich man.
mark jr.
iseeitdifferently // January 30, 2008 at 10:30 pm
…and pre-trib is fantasy, I’ll give you that one. I’m post, but I don’t talk about it because I don’t have any inclination to discuss it. Actually I gave a reason why I don’t talk about it in my “About” thingy.
DT, please man…
…if you’re not here to be a troublemaker like that other really cool guy then I’ll apologize for my shortness with you. Maybe you just really didn’t see it up there in the post. Okay, it happens.
Some folks ignore things on purpose and continue on rediculous diatribes of nothingness when their dumb arguments have been solidly dealt with. You, on the surface, appeared to be of that sort. And coming in on the heels of Noog’s deceptive gamesplaying, you just looked too much like him so you got the kneejerk backhand, for which I apologize.
That said, let me make a clean break and just say that I have dealt with the immortality of the soul in the post and in other responses. Honestly, no offense, but that kind of question seems so silly to me that I have a hard time actually taking time away from my family to argue about the immaterial nature and immortality/perpetuity of the soul.
Have a good night dude.
mark jr.
Eddie // February 1, 2008 at 11:06 pm
A few observations
1. In Rev 20:10, John says that the devil and the false prophet are cast into the lake of fire and brimstone “And they will be tormented day and night forver and ever.”
Then in verse 15 John says..”And anyone not found written in the Book of Life was cast into the lake of fire.”
So from what I understand you to say DT, correct me if I am wrong, That you don’t believe that when unbelievers are judged and not found in the book of life and thrown in the lake of fire…they won’t be tormented “day and night forever and ever”? even though it’s the same lake of fire?
iseeitdifferently // February 1, 2008 at 11:57 pm
Apparently he doesn’t believe in the immortality of the soul.
But uh, if that’s true then we just fade to black if we die in Christ also. But he’ll say that only those in Christ have an immortal soul.
Yeah, it’s a little bit of an exegetical murder charge that he’s really up against.
mark jr.
DT // February 2, 2008 at 8:20 pm
Eddie,
Think of like this. Many get sent to prisons. It’s the same prisons where each one is sent, so does that automatically mean that each is getting the exact same punishment?
Just because satan is being tormented day and night, doesn’t mean man will be. You need to keep in mind, satan has been here far longer than any man. satan could have predated man by billions of years for all we know. With that in mind, why would a fair God expect the same punishment for humans?
No human has ever lived even a 1000 years, and many humans have died in their teens, etc. Do you actually believe they deserve the same punishment as satan?
Man does not have a mortal soul. Genesis 3 proves that fact from the very beginning. 1 Corinthians 15: proves that fact. How can mortal put on immortal, if mortal is already immortal?
Reading 1 Corinthians 15: in context, we can see that this immortality is promised to believers only. That automatically makes the rest mortal, and there is no way around that. A mortal soul can die, and will die, otherwise that soul is not mortal
Matthew // February 10, 2008 at 7:54 am
No, Genesis 3 proves that man doesn’t have an immortal body. In the same way, when Paul talks about the resurrection of the dead in 1 Corinthians 15, he means that they come back to life and get an immortal, resurrected body like Jesus. That’s why the Athenians called Paul a babbler when he talked to them about it. They wouldn’t call him a babbler if he was merely talking about the immortality of the soul, since they already believed that.
Now I can see where you’re coming from with your argument on Revelation 20, but I think that you’re splitting hairs. What’s more important are the implications for your argument in that text. A: If unsaved souls cease to exist when they die, then how can they be resurrected? The clear implication is that they can’t, therefore the logical conclusion is that the soul continued to exist. B: Why bring them back only to send them back into non-existence? If God is too kind to eternally punish Human souls, then isn’t who too kind to do something as petty as bringing someone back from nothingness just to send them right back to it?
I also want to quickly define the second death, which is to say, eternal death. I think we can all agree that eternal death is the lack of eternal life. So what is, Biblically speaking, eternal life? Jesus stated quite clearly, “And this is eternal life: to know you, the only true God, and the one whom you sent-Jesus Christ.” Therefore eternal life is not merely existence, but growing in the knowledge of God and communing with Him.
Now, you also asked some fair questions about punishment for the lost and unreached, and if you guys want, I can address those, but I’m not going to tonight because it’s almost 2 A.M.
Matthew // February 10, 2008 at 7:57 am
Oh, and the scripture reference for my quote is John 17:3.
DT // February 11, 2008 at 5:37 pm
“No, Genesis 3 proves that man doesn’t have an immortal body.”
Think about it for a moment. Do you really feel it was ever in God’s plans for man to live forever in a flesh and blood body? My Bible tells me that flesh and blood can’t inherit the kingdom of God. If it can’t now, then it couldn’t have back then either.”1 Corinthians 15:47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.
48 As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy: and as is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.
49 And as we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.
50 Now this I say, brethren, that flesh and blood cannot inherit the kingdom of God; neither doth corruption inherit incorruption.”
God designed man in such a way, that man requires food and water to survive. Also this world is only so big. If man couldn’t physically die, then how would you be able to explain over population? Where would all these resourses come from to sustain mankind that couldn’t die?
I believe that God had a plan before He ever designed man. He was going to create man to destroy satan. Through man would come the one to accomplish that, Christ Himself. This was the plan. I believe that God hoped man would fall, so that He could put forth His plan that was devised before the foundation of the world.
I believe that Gen 3 was in ref to the immortality of the soul, and not of the body. This was God’s way of having mercy on man. If man would have eaten of the tree of life after the fall, then this would have made man like satan, an immortal creature that could not die, thus being tormented without end. Don’t you get it? Man would have been forever lost to satan. Man would have put on satan’s immortality, not Christ’s.
Let’s compare the fate of satan, and the fate of man to see if they’re really the same.
Revelation 20:10 And the devil that deceived them was cast into the lake of fire and brimstone, where the beast and the false prophet are, and shall be tormented day and night for ever and ever.
Revelation 20:11 And I saw a great white throne, and him that sat on it, from whose face the earth and the heaven fled away; and there was found no place for them.
12 And I saw the dead, small and great, stand before God; and the books were opened: and another book was opened, which is the book of life: and the dead were judged out of those things which were written in the books, according to their works.
13 And the sea gave up the dead which were in it; and death and hell delivered up the dead which were in them: and they were judged every man according to their works.
14 And death and hell were cast into the lake of fire. This is the second death.
15 And whosoever was not found written in the book of life was cast into the lake of fire.
Both man and satan end up in the same place, the lake of fire. They have that in common.
satan is said to be tormented day and night for ever and ever. It doesn’t state this at all about man.
When man is cast into the lake of fire, it’s called the second death. When satan is cast into the lake of fire, there is no mention of a second death. The reason being, because satan has never died even once, so how could he die twice. Clearly the fate of man, and the fate of satan are not the same. Both end up in the same place. One is tormented forever because he can’t die, the other is destroyed because he can die. Why can man die? Because he never ate of the tree of life in the garden after his fall.
You also asked why would God raise the wicked dead only to utterly destroy them. That’s pretty obvious. God is a fair God, and He is the judge. God will give them their trial.
Genesis 2:21 And the LORD God caused a deep sleep to fall upon Adam, and he slept: and he took one of his ribs, and closed up the flesh instead thereof;
22 And the rib, which the LORD God had taken from man, made he a woman, and brought her unto the man.
23 And Adam said, This is now bone of my bones, and flesh of my flesh: she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.
24 Therefore shall a man leave his father and his mother, and shall cleave unto his wife: and they shall be one flesh
This was before man fell. If you study these verses carefully, you can see that this foreshadows what Christ ultimately did. I’ll be glad to explain it to you if you don’t see it.
mbaker // February 11, 2008 at 6:47 pm
“I believe that Gen 3 was in ref to the immortality of the soul, and not of the body. This was God’s way of having mercy on man. If man would have eaten of the tree of life after the fall, then this would have made man like satan, an immortal creature that could not die, thus being tormented without end.”
Huh?
It seems you are rewriting the Bible to make it prove your point. Nice try, but who died and made you God?
DT // February 11, 2008 at 7:56 pm
“Huh?
It seems you are rewriting the Bible to make it prove your point. Nice try, but who died and made you God?”
Why do you say that I am trying to rewrite the Bible to make my point? What did Genesis say?
Genesis 2:16 And the LORD God commanded the man, saying, Of every tree of the garden thou mayest freely eat:
17 But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
So did Adam surely die the very same day that he partook of the fruit of the tree? He sure did.
2 Peter 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
Genesis 5:5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.
It appears to me that Adam died that very same day, just like God promised. 930 years falls within 1 day ie: a thousand years. Also there is nothing recorded in the Bible of anyone living past 1000 years. All have died short of this.
What happened in Genesis was in reference to the first death. What happens in the lake of fire is in reference to the 2nd death, the death of the soul
mbaker // February 11, 2008 at 10:39 pm
I am referring to the conclusions you came to about the scripture, which is extra biblical:
” If man would have eaten of the tree of life after the fall, then this would have made man like satan, an immortal creature that could not die, thus being tormented without end.”
First of all, the tree of life is represented by Christ, not satan. In eating the tree of good and evil they actually bought into satan’s lie, like you are doing DT, that they would be like God.
“Genesis 5:5 And all the days that Adam lived were nine hundred and thirty years: and he died.”
“It appears to me that Adam died that very same day, just like God promised. 930 years falls within 1 day ie: a thousand years. Also there is nothing recorded in the Bible of anyone living past 1000 years. All have died short of this.”
Here again you make an extra-biblical presumption. Adam could not have died the same day for he and Eve were banished from the garden and subsequently reproduced and raised children.
Stop using your Bible to prove a pet theory that has been declared heretical by 2000 years of folks with much more talent at proper exegeis than you.
There are folks who claim God and satan, good and evil together created the universe. Do you fall for that one too?
DT // February 11, 2008 at 11:24 pm
“There are folks who claim God and satan, good and evil together created the universe. Do you fall for that one too?”
That’s actually a pretty rediculous statement to even suggest that I would believe that.
God created satan, and He created him perfect. That was until iniquity was found in him. That is unless you want to claim that Ezekiel 28 is not referring to satan.
Since the tree of life represents Christ, that means that the tree of knowledge of good and evil must represent satan. But I thought the serpent represented satan??
Since you claim that I’m rewriting the Bible, then why don’t you explain why God forbid access to the tree of life after their fall. The tree of life has nothing to do with flesh and blood immorality. There is no such thing as flesh and blood immorality. There never was. That only leaves immortality of the soul, which would be a spiritual body that never die
mbaker // February 12, 2008 at 2:17 am
“Since the tree of life represents Christ, that means that the tree of knowledge of good and evil must represent satan. But I thought the serpent represented satan??”
DT, the serpent was what God turned satan into after he caused the fall. Genesis 3:14:
“Because you have done this, cursed are you above all livestock, and above all beasts of the field: on your belly you shall go, and dust shall you eat all the days of your life.”
You went on to say:
“There is no such thing as flesh and blood immorality. There never was. That only leaves immortality of the soul, which would be a spiritual body that never die”
This a strictly a Gnostic belief called antinomianism.
To quote the Reformed Bible study notes, “The Gnostics taught salvation was for the soul only, making bodily behavior irrelevant to both God’s interest and the soul’s health.”
The Bible speaks of hell as an actual underground place in Phillipians 2: 9-10:
“Therefore, God has highly exalted Him and bestowed on Him the name that is above every name, so that at the name of Jesus every knee should bow in heaven and in earth, AND UNDER THE EARTH, and every tongue confess that Jesus Christ is Lord, to the glory of God the Father.”
lbolm // February 12, 2008 at 5:37 pm
Hear the Word of God from Genisis 3;
22And the LORD God said, Behold, the man is become as one of us, to know good and evil: and now, lest he put forth his hand, and take also of the tree of life, and eat, and live for ever:
23Therefore the LORD God sent him forth from the garden of Eden, to till the ground from whence he was taken.
24So he drove out the man; and he placed at the east of the garden of Eden Cherubims, and a flaming sword which turned every way, to keep the way of the tree of life.
God concludes in verse 22 that the man [Adam=mankind in Hebrew] had to leave the Garden so he would not eat of the Tree of Life and live forever.
All the trees mentioned here were not metaphorical but litteral, to supply the need of food. These two trees mentioned were real and not only represented a type of fruit, but also the Knowledge of God & Evil and the other, The Tree of Life. In both cases God said eat of the fruit!
After the fall, which came not from the fruit itself,but from the disobedience of man. Man had to leave the Garden, lest he eat of the Tree of Life and live forever.
FOREVER !
Had there been no fall, man could have eaten from the Tree of Life and lived forever, and God would have allowed it to happen.
That’s how it works out.
DT // February 12, 2008 at 6:36 pm
“After the fall, which came not from the fruit itself,but from the disobedience of man. Man had to leave the Garden, lest he
eat of the Tree of Life and live forever.
FOREVER !
Had there been no fall, man could have eaten from the Tree of Life and lived forever, and God would have allowed it to
happen.
That’s how it works out.”
If you read the Bible in context, you’ll realize this wasn’t so. God had a plan before He even created man. Satan had fallen before man was created. Man had to fall in order to destroy satan.
The tree of life couldn’t have possibly been referring to flesh and blood immortality. Like I’ve already pointed out, God didn’t design man to live forever in a flesh and blood body. You do know that man is consisted of body, soul, and spirit, right? God put these within the body of man before man ever fell. If it were in God’s intentions for man to live forever in a flesh and blood body, then perhaps you could explain why man also has a soul and a spirit? And while you’re explaining that, explain that if the tree of life meant immortality of the flesh and blood body back in the garden, then why doesn’t it mean the same thing now
iseeitdifferently // February 12, 2008 at 9:19 pm
Satan didn’t fall before man was created. After man was created God still said that everything was good. He would not have called it good (perfect is what God considers good) if there was a devil running around. On the 7th day everything was still good, no sin. Satan’s fall was after creation.
Genesis 1:31 says “And God saw everything that he had made, and behold, it was very good. And there was evening and there was morning, the sixth day.”
The very next verse is Genesis 2:1 which finishes the thought of verse 31 in chapter 1 and reads “Thus the heavens and the earth were finished, and all the host of them.”
Everything was finished by the 6th day, man AND the host of heaven and it was still good by the 7th day.
When did Satan fall? No way to know, but it was after man was created. We weren’t created to destroy satan, that’s silly and absurd. We were created by God for the same reason that Jen (the wife) and I make babies; we want children. In fact Malachi stated very clearly (2:15) why God made us and made the man and woman into one: Godly offspring….i.e., more folks down here in His image for His own good pleasure.
Don’t twist what God has made straight (obvious and understandable).
mark jr.
DT // February 12, 2008 at 10:42 pm
Hi, isid.
I used to kind of hold to the view that satan fell in the garden. I pretty much saw it the way you do. But what we have to consider is this. There was a tree of knowledge of good and evil in the garden. Notice the word ‘evil’. If what you believe is correct, then how could there be knowledge of evil existing before man fell?
“We weren’t created to destroy satan, that’s
silly and absurd.”
So then I guess this prophesy wasn’t about Christ afterall then, right?
Genesis 3:15 And I will put enmity between thee and the woman, and between thy seed and her seed; it shall bruise thy head, and thou shalt bruise his heel
iseeitdifferently // February 12, 2008 at 11:14 pm
It wasn’t a tree of evil. It was a tree of “knowledge” of good and evil. God knows everything. He knew what evil was: it’s the opposite of Him. It’s independance of Him. Why He left opportunity for it, I don’t intend to ever tackle on this blog.
God always knew what evil was; there isn’t anything that He doesn’t know about. “Sin” didn’t exist yet, that’s what I keyed in on.
The prophecy you refer to is after Satan’s fall and after our creation. So it still remains that we weren’t created to destroy him originally. We have been given charge to have authority (in Jesus) over him, but’s that’s after that fact.
This prophecy was about Jesus….yeah, but uh….it doesn’t really have anything to do with the order of creation and when the fall had to have taken place. Actually, it doesn’t have anything to do with this discussion…
?
mark jr.
Matthew // February 13, 2008 at 6:35 am
“Think about it for a moment. Do you really feel it was ever in God’s plans for man to live forever in a flesh and blood body?”
Yes, though not the corrupt bodies we have now. We will get the same kind of physical, resurrected body that Jesus has. “Thy dead men shall live, together with my dead body shall they arise.” Isaiah 26:19
iseeitdifferently // February 13, 2008 at 12:25 pm
Matthew, thank you for quoting that from DT.
I forgot to get on that part where he says, “do you ‘feel’”….
Feel? C’mon now, we don’t do the ‘feel’ thing over and above the revelation that’s written down. My feelings are in subjection to what IS.
So never mind what anyone feels, what saith the scriptures? They cannot be broken.
mark jr.
DT // February 13, 2008 at 4:15 pm
“Yes, though not the corrupt bodies we have now. We will get the same kind of physical, resurrected body that Jesus
has. “Thy dead men shall live, together with my dead body shall they arise.” Isaiah 26:19″
You are really missing the point I was trying to stress. If what you’re saying is correct, if man would have eaten of the tree of life, then man would have lived forever in the body that he was already in. He wouldn’t have gotten a new body. That goes against what Scripture teaches. What you’re saying just can’t work. This body has to die in order to get a new body. That’s the way it works. That is what the Bible teaches. It was NEVER in God’s intentions for man to live forever in this flesh body. That’s why this body also has a soul and spirit. God placed them there for a reason. What does all of this have to do with the subject at hand? Everything. The tree of life represents immortality of the soul, not immortality of the flesh. And since God forbid access to the tree of life after the fall, we can be assured that no man is immortal, body or soul. The tree of life is not Christ. Christ is the way back to the tree of life.
Revelation 22:1 And he shewed me a pure river of water of life, clear as crystal, proceeding out of the throne of God and of the Lamb.
2 In the midst of the street of it, and on either side of the river, was there the tree of life, which bare twelve manner of fruits, and yielded her fruit every month: and the leaves of the tree were for the healing of the nations.
Revelation 2:7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is in the midst of the paradise of God.
Jesus made these statements. If He were the tree of life then why would He make statements such as this, clearly distinguishing Himself from the tree of life. For this to be Christ, the verse would have to be rendered something such as this:
Revelation 2:7 He that hath an ear, let him hear what the Spirit saith unto the churches; To him that overcometh will I give to eat of the tree of life, which is ME in the midst of the paradise of God.
As you can see, that rendering changes the whole meaning of the verse. The tree of life was in the midst of the paradise of God when it was in Eden. It is still within the midst of the paradise of God and has always been there. When the garden of Eden was on earth, this was the paradise of God. When God removed His paradise from the earth, the tree of Life went also. When Christ left heaven to come to the earth, and if Christ is the tree of life, then that meant that the tree of life was no longer in the midst of the paradise of God. But the Bible teaches that the tree of life is located and has always been located in the midst of the paradise of God.
Eddie // February 14, 2008 at 3:38 am
DT,
Matthew 25:41
“Then he will also say to those on the left hand (the goats that have been sepertated from the sheep, believers and unbelievers) Depart from Me, you cursed, into the everlasting fire prepared for the devil and his angels:
V46 is the kicker:
v46 “and these (the goats again) will go away into ,EVERLASTING PUNISHMENT (the lake of fire) but the righteous unto eternal life.”
The same greek word is used in both instances. The punishment for the wicked is as never ending as the eternal life for the righteous.
It’s the same lake of fire in Revelation 20:14 and 15
Eddie // February 14, 2008 at 3:42 am
One more thing DT, you mentioned several times about God being fair…well if God were truly fair…we’d all be in hell right now. Do you really want God to be fair? God is Just …not fair.
Jan // February 14, 2008 at 4:21 am
OK, I just need to add a little to all that has been argued here – first of all, the part about all of the people in heaven “knowing” that their family members, friends, whoever, are suffering in eternal hell – I believe there is a scripture that says that when people “arrive” in heaven, God will wipe away all of their tears, and they will (basically) have no sadness anymore. I think this means that our memories of all of those who did not “make it” to Heaven will pass away, therefore, in my humble opinion, our memories of all of those will “be no more”. Makes sense to me, anyway.
Also, I’ve always believed that God is not the one sending people to hell. We all have a choice, and although God will be incredibly sad about the ones who do not accept Him, WE are the ones making the decision to follow Him or not. That’s just the way I believe it’s going to happen – we have a choice, and we make the decision. Simple. Or hard. But fair.
Vincent Alderman // February 14, 2008 at 4:56 am
I hate to be the Calvinist on this blog because I know that you guys “don’t like Calvinists.” But this is more of a response to Jan’s comments. I heard something from John Piper and it goes something like this…”on the outside of the gates of heaven it will say, “whoever shall come, come. On the inside of the gates it will say predestined before the foundations of the world.” Like I said I am not sure exactly how this pertains to the whole of this conversation so lets say this is for Jan. Here are some verse from Romans 9 as well.
20Nay but, O man, who art thou that repliest against God? Shall the thing formed say to him that formed it, Why hast thou made me thus?
21Hath not the potter power over the clay, of the same lump to make one vessel unto honour, and another unto dishonour?
22What if God, willing to shew his wrath, and to make his power known, endured with much longsuffering the vessels of wrath fitted to destruction:
23And that he might make known the riches of his glory on the vessels of mercy, which he had afore prepared unto glory,
DT // February 14, 2008 at 4:57 pm
“We all have a choice, and although God will
be incredibly sad about the ones who do not accept Him, WE are the ones making the decision to follow Him or not.
That’s just the way I believe it’s going to happen – we have a choice, and we make the decision. Simple. Or hard. But
fair.”
Jan I agree with you. Anyone that ends up in the lake of fire goes there because they refuse God’s grace. This doesn’t mean that God has to or is going to torment them without end.
Let’s compare 2 types of people. Believers that make it into the kingdom of God, the rest that don’t. What do both of these groups have in common while in the flesh?
Both groups are sinners. So let’s say out of the first group, the worst sins that one of these committed was telling sev lies. Now let’s say there was also one like this in the second group, that one told sev lies while living in the flesh, but other than that lived basically a clean life. Why does this person deserve to be tormented forever, but the one in the first group doesn’t? What I’m getting at, it’s not our sins that get us thrown into the lake of fire, it’s our rejection of God’s grace, and rejection of His Son, that’s how we end up there. If it were only our sins that end us there, then we would all end up there.
Some professed Christian thinks this gives them a license to sin, but I don’t believe that is so. I believe that is mocking grace, and that can also get one cast into the lake of fire. We’re supposed to repent and turn from our wicked ways, not repent and continue
in our wicked ways.
And finally, I’ve searched the Bible and I honestly can’t find anywhere
that suggests ALL men have or will have immortal souls. When a fact such as this contradicts a teaching elsewhere in Scripture, then that can only mean that the teaching is in error. Truth doesn’t contradict itself. So if endless torment is truth, then one needs to explain how there can be so many contradictions to that truth. And if one just wants to admit that the 2nd death means death and not life(endless torment), one will see that it squares with Scripture from Genesis to Revelation
iseeitdifferently // February 14, 2008 at 7:13 pm
“I hate to be the Calvinist on this blog because I know that you guys “don’t like Calvinists.” ”
That’s totally untrue bro, you should know that well enough. I got lotsa Calvinist friends. Check my blogroll…
mark jr.
vincent alderman // February 14, 2008 at 7:25 pm
Thanks Mark…I put it in quotes to be kind of sarcastic anyways. But I know you are not to fawned of most Calvinist beliefs.
iseeitdifferently // February 14, 2008 at 7:26 pm
And upon reading the last several comments on this thread, the rediculousness of it all is annoying.
I’m closing comments because there is a plethora of speaking, yet a total lack of content.
DT, you are asking questions and raising points that are absurd and have been dealt with. This merry-go-round is coming to a hault. You’re giving me the impression that you’re something of an intellectual black hole. We can throw truth at you all day long and it just ends up nowhere and you keep saying the same silly things.
Enough.
Like gas stations in rural Texas after 10 pm, comments are closed.