Hand Me A Scalpel

Many Talk but Few Preach

January 17, 2008 · 13 Comments

The theme of preaching is on my mind this slightly snowy morning here in the Queen City. More specifically the idea of what preaching actually is and what it should accomplish, what it is opposed to teaching, how to know when you are hearing actual preaching and so on. I hear the phrase “biblical preaching” a lot. I honestly believe that this now means nothing more than teaching scripture, an absolute neccessity and almost totally non-existant in Pentecostal/Charismatic church settings. But teaching line upon line, precept upon precept is not the same as preaching. If they were one and the same then Paul would not have differentiated between the spiritual gift of teaching and the spiritual gift of preaching, nor would he have maintained that there were teachers in the body as well as preachers. This is like me telling you that I have a Toyota truck in my driveway and a Ford truck in my driveway; two distinct automobiles. I wouldn’t tell you, “I have an ‘86 Toyota pick up and I also have a Toyota pickup made in 1986.” And so we can safely know that Paul wouldn’t have used language to describe two different things unless they were two different things.

I say all that because when the topic of preaching comes up, I most often hear people strongly affirm the need to return (in the church) to true preaching. But what they end up describing is exegetical teaching which tells me that a lot of folks still have no clue what preaching really is. Now I have to say that preaching without any teaching is not preaching and teaching that has no preaching in it is not teaching. The lines, in my opinion, ought to blur a bit between the two. But I think we need to regain an understanding of the function of preaching and know what it is as being disctinct from teaching.

So this morning I looked at the word ‘preach’, even though I already have several times. I’m always blown away by the definition. Look at this definition closely, take a few minutes to chew on this and mull it over in your mind. Everything about this word implies having received something directly from an authority figure and now being employed in the delivery of that specific message. A herald didn’t take upon himself to just run around telling people in the land what the laws where and helping them understand them. There were local governing authorities to do all that. No, the herald would be summoned by a King, given a message and told to proclaim it as he had received it and to speak it in that King’s name so that when this herald is speaking throughout the land it is not the herald that people are hearing, but the one who sent him. To reject this herald is to incur the wrath of the King who sent Him and almost certainly bring about his judgment upon whosoever would scorn his words.

So the most important aspect of this word ‘preach’ has first of all to do with the man speaking. The King has to know him and trust him. This herald is picked and groomed for this very task and may undergo years of training in order to be trusted with this task. He has to know how to communicate not just the letter of the King’s message but it’s spirit, essence, character. If it be a message of encouragement, he has to be able to communicate the word in this fashion. If it be a word of warning, he must speak so as to reveal the seriousness of the King. If it be a call to arms, there has to be a sense of import and need in the very delivery of the word. And this cannot be if the herald himself does not really believe what he’s saying to be all that important. Imagine a call to war that goes like this:
“DUDE, we’re like, totally gonna fight these guys and then we’re gonna be all like, ‘whoa, we won’ and so like just get stoked boys and girls and let’s do it! Woo hoo!!”
Huh?
What is said has to fit the way it is said. You can’t preach a message about the King’s anger with a smirk and a smile. The herald has to allow his demeanor to actually be animated by what he knows to be the King’s own sentiments. Really, he has to be one with the King in heart and mind and purpose or this will never work.

So the first and most important part of a preacher has to do with the means that God Himself undertakes to make such a one into a man who is trusted with such a task. And yet, this man will always say with Paul, “Who is sufficient for these things?” or he’s not worthy to speak. The herald of God has to know that he can do nothing without the Life of God in him doing it through him.

Now look again at this word preach. Do you see the part that talks about speaking with a gravity and authority that is understood as requiring obedience of the one hearing the message spoken? This, to me, blows out of the water so much sissy lah-lah preaching today that amounts to a bunch of nice suggestions that pander to the marginally interested churchian. Where is the heavy word, the weighty word of requirement? When was the last time a man stood and spoke in the Name of the Lord and the word spoken felt like it just disemboweled you and all your categories? When was the last time a word came forth that was so powerful that you didn’t for one second have to question where it came from because of the level of conviction and inner turmoil it produced? And real preaching doesn’t have to always make you squirm, but it should still come with an inherant power, conviction, gravity and authority that can’t be ignored and instantly apprehends the listener and has them knowing they are being addressed by God Himself, though human flesh happens to be the microphone and p.a. system that God employs.

So I hear on the radio and have seen on TV a lot of talking, suggesting, supposing and what not. I also hear great, scholarly and exegetical teaching. But where is the preacher? Where is the man aflame with the fire of God who when he speaks leaves no doubt that you just heard a real prophet? A real prophet never has to tell you that he is one, he just is and need not bother himself with making sure that everyone gives him the respect of being received as a prophet, as many seem to feel the need to do. This in itself is a manifest proof of a total lack of that calling, or else having the call with no understanding of how to behave in it.

Preaching is of uttmost importance because it is a means of salvation according to the apostle Paul in Romans 10:14. This verse is incredible to me. Paul says that the faith that saves and gives Life comes by hearing, and this hearing comes when the message is preached and that this preacher must be sent. So the whole issue of preaching is ultimately tied up in the man himself and wether or not he is even sent for this task. I’ll have to post seperately on what goes into a man before he’s even sent because it’s too rich and full to get into right now. But it’s interesting that this word ‘preach’ implies a herald, a man already prepared for a task of preaching; then it shows that the word implies gravity and authority.
So the process starts with a man chosen by God, groomed by God, dealt with by God and sent by God. The sent man preaches the message as God Himself would speak it. This opens ears so that God is heard addressing the listener. Hearing opens the heart to bring in faith/belief. Faith then brings you to confession/repentance, leading to life (Acts 2:38, 3:19-20, 2 Cor.7:10). So we can see that this business about preaching is of uttmost importance. Life and death hang in the balance. The only thing that can alter one’s eternity is an eternal word from an eternal God spoken by a man who has been burned by eternity’s reality (“Oh God, stamp eternity on my eyeballs!!”).

So I’d like to encourage those who aspire to preach to not think yourselves qualified to do so strictly on the basis of your skills in exegeting. That does not and will never make you a preacher. You need to be willing to live in deserts, have your flesh grated, be resisted, hated, mocked, live a restricted life (“other’s may, you may not”) and speak only when spoken to. And please, stop confusing teaching with preaching. Both are needed but they are not the same. People are coming out of seminaries thinking they are doing one thing when it is not and therefore will always fall short of what a real preacher is and does.

What is a preacher? Study Elijah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel, John the Baptist, Jesus, Paul, Peter, etc. Study the lives, the strife they endured, the deserts, their diets, their clothing. This may sound odd, but not one detail about a prophet is insignificant. Look at those who opposed them and what their message was in opposition to God’s…

…and pray for God to raise up some real preachers.

mark jr.

Categories: Charismatic Issues · Christian Living · Doctrine · Evangelism · Faith · Preaching · Revival · Spirit Led Living · Things Prophetic · Unparticular Particularities · Word of Faith Nonsense · salvation
Tagged: , , , , , , , ,

13 responses so far ↓

  • mbaker // January 18, 2008 at 12:46 am | Reply

    A thought provoking article, Mark, Jr. Thanks for another well presented post.

    I think the Lord is calling us all to be more discerning about who and where we place our trust nowadays. Having a good tell it like it is preacher, who actually can actually deliver a message the way God intends His people to receive His word, is becoming all too rare nowadays. I know I am getting fed up with the wanna-be’s and people pleasers who fancy themselves good preachers because their churches are filled up, and so are their wallets. Give me a honest man nowadays who can courageously do and say what needs to be done for the true spiritual welfare of his flock, and his family, and I’ll show you one who is doing the real work of God.

    Good show.

  • thegreycoats // January 18, 2008 at 3:17 pm | Reply

    Amen. excellent post. i agree whole heartedly.

  • Noogatiger // January 18, 2008 at 6:34 pm | Reply

    What is the difference in preaching and brainwashing? Arn’t they both “coercive persuasion”, as the defenition of brainwashing says, since the preacher is trying to persuade soemone to believe something which can only be accepted on faith?

  • iseeitdifferently // January 18, 2008 at 9:27 pm | Reply

    If you want to know what brainwashing is, ask Richard Wurmbrand. Google it…

    True preaching requires no techniques of coercion; coercion is anti-thetical to true preaching. Coercive technique is on TBN if you need a demonstration. Paul Washer is a preacher. Grab Paul Washer clips off YouTube to see the difference.
    That’s the whole point of the post. We’re full of this crap today and it doesn’t work. Just speak it out as it is given to you.

    mark jr.

  • Eddie // January 19, 2008 at 9:12 pm | Reply

    Good post mark.

    I read a blog the other day by someone you and I both know and he asked the question. “Is the word “freakin” allowed from the pulpit?” He said his pastor used it twice in his sermon. (I’ll send ya the link if ya like so you can read it.) I’m sure paul used the word somewhere in his sermons…it probably got lost in the translations somewhere..:-)

    Mind if I send him your link..:-).

  • iseeitdifferently // January 19, 2008 at 9:45 pm | Reply

    Nah, go ahead and be sure to email me the link.

    …I can’t think of who it is for some reason.

    mark jr.

  • Seeking Disciple // January 30, 2008 at 7:01 pm | Reply

    I have heard too many sermons that were full of talking but not full of the power and presence of God (1 Corinthians 2:1-5). I strongly believe in sound doctrine (Titus 2:1) but give us preachers with a passion for Jesus that goes beyond knowing Him only from a distance.

  • Dave // January 31, 2008 at 9:12 am | Reply

    @Seeking Disciple – have you ever come across Rob Rufus? I highly recommend checking him out. He is a man filled with passion for the word and who walks with God intimately. His preaching is powerful and he has had a profound impact on my understanding of the gospel through his teaching on grace and law. He also has a very mature approach to the supernatural and the power of God in miracles, signs and wonders (some of his personal testimonies are outstanding).

  • Eddie // February 1, 2008 at 1:00 am | Reply

    Here are few quotes on preaching that I thought y’all might like.

    Eddie

    Matthew Henry: Those who teach by their doctrine must teach by their life, or else they pull down with one hand what they build up with the other.

    A.W. Tozer: I do not preach any new truth. I do not have any new doctrine. . . . We must have a revival that will mean purity of heart as a normal standard for everybody. We must be clean people, and not only clean outside.

    John Owen: A minister may fill his pews, his communion roll, the mouths of the public, but what that minister is on his knees in secret before God Almighty, that he is and no more.

    John Wesley: Give me one hundred preachers who fear nothing but sin, and desire nothing but God, and I care not a straw whether they be clergymen or laymen; such alone will shake the gates of hell and set up the kingdom of heaven on earth.

    Arthur W. Pink: From every pulpit in the land it needs to be thundered forth that God still lives, that God still observes, . . . [and] still reigns. Faith is now in the crucible, it is being tested by fire, and there is no fixed . . . resting place for the heart and mind but in the Throne of God. What is needed now, as never before, is a full, positive, constructive setting forth of the Godhood of God.

    Robert Murray M’Cheyne: Remember you are God’s sword — His instrument — I trust a chosen vessel unto Him to bear His name. In great measure, according to the purity and perfections of the instrument will be the success. It is not great talents God blesses so much as great likeness to Jesus. A holy minister is an awful weapon in the hand of God.

  • thegreycoats // February 7, 2008 at 4:07 am | Reply

    hey i got your email nat forwarded it to me. um i dont know if i can make march cause my wife and i are due to have another baby on the third of that month. but mabye devin could go. if it werent for that i would definately be down. i will run it by him. peace.

  • Brandon // February 14, 2008 at 5:53 am | Reply

    Please do a part II to this like you said you would, and who is Richard Wurmbrand i serached him up and read about him on wikipedia and googled him and everything was in a very positive light, but i watched this thing of him on you tube and he said he saw jesus in person and saw the ‘love in his eyes’ and jesus ’spoke words of love and kindness and forgiveness’ and said their sins were “passed away” or something, and all things evil in them were gone.

    He definitely doesn’t seam right, but what do you mean about brainwashing?

  • iseeitdifferently // February 14, 2008 at 7:19 pm | Reply

    Our sins are gone Brando. Nailed, cleansed. I know what video you’re talking about…I don’t think he said anything like, “all evil in them is gone”.
    I have no problems with a man having a vision of Jesus being with them while they are in a communist prison for 14 years being tortured. They had literally lost their minds from pain by that point in time…I would like to think that God would supply grace in some kind of way to stabilize them.

    Keep searching YouTube for Wurmbrands brainwashing video. You’ll find it…it’s also on Sermon Index dot net.
    mark jr.

  • Brandon // February 15, 2008 at 6:54 am | Reply

    i still dont know… anyone who says they’ve seen jesus in person kind of bothers me…. but he seams cool…

    bed time – night marko :)

    pray for me

Leave a Comment